With regards to nature and renewable energy, there are a lot of cynics out there – individuals who deny that climate change exists or accept that coal power can never be supplanted by environmentally friendly alternatives.
Here are some of the most widely recognized contentions made by renewable energy rivals, and – all the more significantly – how you can disprove them:
Contention 1: Renewable energy is too expensive
The expense of executing renewable energy has fallen dramatically over current years, both for homeowners and manufacturer. As the technology turns out to be progressively predominant, it has turned out to be less expensive.
When contrasted with conventional energy sources, there are other cost savings to be made. Wind and sunlight, in contrast to coal, are used for free. They likewise include less hidden expenses. Coal and nuclear energy cause water contamination, they influence public health, and they're main reason for climate change. Governments spend much of public money take action to these emergencies making them less cost-effective than they may appear.
Contention 2: Renewable energy can't meet all of our energy needs
Renewable energy is as of now working dependably in nations around the globe. Each nation can possibly exploit wind and solar energy. What's more, numerous nations are as of now depending on renewables for an impressive level of their energy supply.
Germany gets 25% of its electricity from renewables. Spain gets 42%. Portugal got an unbelievable 70% of its energy from renewable sources during the first quarter of 2013. What's more, Denmark intends to create 100% of its heat and power with renewable energy by 2035. With the proper construction and government support, renewable energy can surely meet the greater part, if not all, of our energy needs.
Contention 3: Renewable energy isn't reliable
Renewable energy generation is in its outset. In numerous nations, it works on a relatively little scale. What's more, we can't depend on the wind to blow or the sun to shine all the time. This implies renewable energy alone at present isn't a dependable method to keep the lights on 24 hours of each day of every year.
Be that as it may, power sources will progressively be spread over a more extensive region. Smart technologies will be utilized to follow and oversee energy use processes. Better stockpiling frameworks will be set up. These elements will enable dynamic networks to create, store and offer renewable energy for homes and organizations throughout a country. The greater the renewable energy industry turns into, the more valuable and reliable it will be.
Contention 4: Renewable energy production takes up too much space
The land required for renewable energy sources is really quite minor. A MIT study on solar energy found that 100% of energy needs in the U.S. could be met by solar energy if panels spread 33,000 square kilometers of land. That may appear to be a great deal, yet the U.S. as of now commits 10,000 square kilometers of land just to golf courses. And afterward there's the whole underutilized space, for example, housetops, parking areas and landfills where solar panels could be introduced.
Contention 5: Renewable energy is a fad
Renewable energy is staying put. It's a pattern that is just barely starting to grab hold. Conventional energy makers have attempted to frustrate its growth. Be that as it may, with climate change at the highest point of the agenda for some countries, the extent and reach of renewable energy is developing in nations all around the globe. What's more, as the business earns more money, technological advances and efficiencies will be more effectively reachable.
It tends to baffle contending with somebody who doesn't have faith in renewable energies. In any case, with the correct counterarguments available to you, there's no motivation behind why you can't expose the most widely recognized of their spurious statements.